• Milgram experiment - Wikipedia
  • Revisiting Milgram's shocking obedience experiments
  • What Milgram’s Shock Experiments Really Mean - …

Milgram, S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18, 57-76.

Chances are you’ve heard of Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiments

The Milgram Experiment Today? « The Situationist

Milgram Experiments | Ethics in Practice
Perhaps more surprisingly, the participants in the experiments were themselves recruited into engaged follower­ship. "Once Milgram explained the nobility of the enterprise (in terms of progressing human under­standing), participants became reconciled to, and even enthus­iastic about, the role they had played" (Haslam et al, 2015).

Milgram experiment - Simple English Wikipedia, the …

"Compliance: The Milgram Experiment" - Open …
Milgram's experiment stimulated dis­cussion about the need to protect the rights of research subjects. In the 1970s and 1980s, universities and other research institutions put safeguards in place to insure participants would not face stressful or harmful conditions during research.

 

The Milgram experiment may be the most ..

How Milgram's experiments worked.
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Birney, M. E. (2016) Questioning authority: New perspectives on Milgram's 'obedience' research and its implications for intergroup relations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 6-9.

Stanford Prison Experiment, Milgram Experiment
"How did it become "normal" and "ok" for a small group of scientists to subject innocent American citizens as a matter of routine to such extraordinary levels of abuse?" (Nicholson, 2015). The proposed answer is that Milgram created "engaged followership" in both his research associates and the experi­mental subjects.


What can we learn from the Milgram experiment

Having made these new criticisms, several writers in the 2010s said it was no longer appropriate to include the obedience research in teaching materials about the Holocaust. Instead, attention should be paid to the phenom­enon of engaged followership. People adopt an ideology that allows them to torture other people without guilt, as did Milgram and his fellow experimenters.

Milgram experiment on obedience

21st Century critics portray Milgram and his associates as the bad guys. They were the ones like the Nazis, because they held a belief system (about the value of their research) that rationalized putting hundreds of trusting experimental subjects through traumatic and stressful situations, despite verbal objections.

Scientists Just Replicated The Infamous Milgram Experiment

(3) Milgram implied that the obed­ient subjects were the bad guys, similar to Nazi prison guards. They followed orders to torture a fellow experimental subject despite cries of pain.

Milgram Experiment Obedience : Free Download

Nicholson argued that Milgram's research program was similar in justifying large-scale torture. It was not a small enterprise; it was cruelty on an industrial scale, ultimately including more than 780 participants in dozens of variations on the experiment.

The Shocking Truth of the Notorious Milgram …

Not so fast, say critics 50 years later. Nazi guards reported no signs of distress similar to Milgram's studies. Some of them protested they were idealists. Their motivation was engaged followership, not obedience.