• Religion and capital punishment - Wikipedia
  • Free capital punishment Essays and Papers - 123HelpMe
  • Facts about capital punishment - the death penalty

Capital punishment or death penalty can be defined the legally authoeized killing someone as punishment for crime.

Free capital punishment papers, essays, and research papers.

"Executing the mentally retarded is senseless cruelty

Despite what most believe, capital punishment is not functional in the American society.
Indeed, one study showed that criminals, by a 5:1ratio, believed that capital punishment was a significant enough deterrentto prevent them and/or others from murdering their victims (People vs Love,56 Cal 2d 720 (1961), McComb, J.

Australians Against Capital Punishment | AACP’s website

Capital punishmentcan be used only as a vehicle to preventing future crimes.
Here too Fastiggi’s position is simply perverse. It also commits the fallacy of – the fallacy of applying an arbitrary double standard. Fastiggi can’t have it both ways. If he is going to insist that Catholics have to assent to even non-infallible exercises of the ordinary papal magisterium, then to be consistent he has to acknowledge that Catholics have to assent to the clear and consistent teaching of Innocent I, Innocent III, Pius V, Pius X, Pius XII, John Paul II, and all the other popes who have affirmed the legitimacy in principle of capital punishment. But if, on the other hand, he allows that a Catholic can reject these previous clear magisterial statements, then to be consistent he has to allow that a Catholic could also reject instead the more recent ambiguous statements of Pope Francis.


Capital Punishment - Jewish Virtual Library

Since then, the debate over capital punishment has been never-ending, capturing the attention of citizens of all types.
Many supporters of capital punishment cite retribution as being a justification for the death penalty; however, no matter what the circumstance, murder is never justified.

These two realities can also be regarded as two bearing pillars in the defense of capital punishment.
Bruce Franklin of “Billy Budd and Capital Punishment: A Tale of Three Centuries” investigates the underlying controversial feud that represents the issue of the story, and details the debates surrounding the “profound influence on American culture” (1-18).

Capital punishment - New World Encyclopedia

The upshot of all thisis that trying to put abortion, capital punishment and war in one packagemakes chaos of Catholic morals and can lead one to misinterpret God’s Law.

Yes, traditional Church teaching on capital punishment …

Scripture, the Fathers and Doctors of the Church, and the popes for 2000 years have taught that capital punishment can be legitimate in principle. In at – and at greater length in , which I co-authored with Joseph Bessette – I have argued that this teaching is irreformable. Neither Pope Francis nor any other pope has the authority to change it, consistent with the Church’s indefectibility. Prof. Robert Fastiggi disagrees, and in has tried to rebut my arguments. But his own arguments commit several fallacies.

I appreciate the points raised by Prof

Now, one of the key considerations I have been emphasizing is that the Church maintains that Scripture is divinely inspired and cannot teach moral error. The Church also teaches that where the Fathers of the Church are unanimous on some question of Scriptural interpretation, Catholics are obliged to follow them. But the Fathers of the Church unanimously teach that Scripture sanctions the legitimacy of capital punishment at least in principle. The unavoidable logical implication is that Catholics are obliged to hold that the legitimacy in principle of capital punishment is a divinely inspired and thus infallible teaching. That alone suffices to show that no pope can reverse it. (Again, whether capital punishment is advisable in practice is a separate issue, which I am not addressing here.)

Edward Feser on Pope Francis’ recent statements on capital punishment

But this is simply irrelevant to the that is at issue between Fastiggi and me. Yes, some of the Fathers were strongly opposed to the use of capital punishment in . But I never denied that. What I said is that they were unanimous that capital punishment is wrong, that it can be legitimate at least . And . This unanimous judgment includes Fathers like Tertullian and Lactantius, who – in other passages that Fastiggi does quote (but which Joe Bessette and I quote in our book) – allow that capital punishment can at least in theory be legitimate.